Friday, September 29, 2006

More data this weekend, STOPs and ILMN

I will be adding some more this weekend as promised.
That will include Stops as well.

In the meantime, ILMN continues to drop a little bit without any news. I don't have strong sense of why.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

ILMN up then down

ILMN gave up all of its 1 week gains today. Some of that gain probably came from JP Morgan's focus on ILMN announced Monday.

There was a lawsuit between 2 partners of ILMN over some code. But whichever one wins shouldn't matter to ILMN - it works with both.

No reason has been released so I can only make a conjecture that a big player got out.
This is evidenced by the almost 3X volume of shares - strong indication of a big move by a single player.
Timing - it comes after a big 10% breakout run (from 33 to 36.5)

At the same time, note that the CEO is increasing sales staff 50%. That means potential for rapid sales growth. In other words, an important shift in resources away from R&D and over to sales usually comes before sales acceleration.

Without any news, it could be a profit lock move or someone heard earnings release info and is running for cover. I hate big drops on heavy volume and no news.

I can't make a recommendation to buy or not at this time. Not enough info. The technicals look fine

GDP Revised Down from 2.9% to 2.6%

The Q2 (April-June) GDP was revised downwards a hefty amount. I like it.
- The 2.6% is still a healthy growth rate for an economy of our size
- An even lower GDP gives the Fed breathing room with interest rates

The Fed is obviously playing a waiting game wherein they hope the slowing economy will ease inflationary pressures and thereby remove the need to raise interest rates. Raising interest rates is always tricky because the impact is delayed and the Fed has a history of overshooting and causing more damage. This time, all looks good.

However, considering that inflation came in at 2.7% and GDP was 2.6%, that means real growth was slightly negative. Not really a cause for concern but it is indicative of a slowing economy. I think that inflation will come in much lower this quarter (July-Sept) because already prices of housing construction materials are dropping fast (lumber, steel, and so forth) and gas has dropped 20% - although this is not part of the core PPI/CPI.
- From the standpoint of inflation triggering interest rate hikes, this is not high enough to cause action.
- In terms of context, this is almost the same growth that we had in Q4 of last year. Remove Q1 of this year, and our growth has been steady.
- Corporate profits are being eroded. This is the key area of focus for me. I fully expect a lot of disappointing earnings surprises this quarter.

Behind the revised numbers, some key elements worth noting are:
1. Consumer spending was not changed. It clocked in at a healthy 2.6%, down a bit from the 4.8% of the Q1 period.
2. Business investment was revised up. It was still down 1.4%, but as we saw from Oracle's earnings release a few weeks ago, businesses are still buying software

GDP Revised Down from 2.9% to 2.6%

The Q2 (April-June) GDP was revised downwards a hefty amount. I like it.
- The 2.6% is still a healthy growth rate for an economy of our size
- An even lower GDP gives the Fed breathing room with interest rates

The Fed is obviously playing a waiting game wherein they hope the slowing economy will ease inflationary pressures and thereby remove the need to raise interest rates. Raising interest rates is always tricky because the impact is delayed and the Fed has a history of overshooting and causing more damage. This time, all looks good.

However, considering that inflation came in at 2.7% and GDP was 2.6%, that means real growth was slightly negative. Not really a cause for concern but it is indicative of a slowing economy. I think that inflation will come in much lower this quarter (July-Sept) because already prices of housing construction materials are dropping fast (lumber, steel, and so forth) and gas has dropped 20% - although this is not part of the core PPI/CPI.
- From the standpoint of inflation triggering interest rate hikes, this is not high enough to cause action.
- In terms of context, this is almost the same growth that we had in Q4 of last year. Remove Q1 of this year, and our growth has been steady.
- Corporate profits are being eroded. This is the key area of focus for me. I fully expect a lot of disappointing earnings surprises this quarter.

Behind the revised numbers, some key elements worth noting are:
1. Consumer spending was not changed. It clocked in at a healthy 2.6%, down a bit from the 4.8% of the Q1 period.
2. Business investment was revised up. It was still down 1.4%, but as we saw from Oracle's earnings release a few weeks ago, businesses are still buying software

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Are oil equipment and Services still investment worthy?

During my 2 weeks hiatus, oil equipment stocks went as low as 15% and are still down ~10%.
I see this as a profound buying opportunity and here is why.


Oil is a commodity with some unique characteristics.

  • It takes a while to go from investment to yield (i.e. drilling to shipping barrels). As opposed to farming where it is easy to get more output quickly.
  • There are substitutes at the fringes (coal for electricity, for example) but there is no substitute for mobility (planes, cars, boats) or petrochemicals

The result: supply and demand set the terms in a very clear way. It is my belief that in the short term:

  1. There are many new sources of demand, primarily China and India. Automotive and Airplane usage will drive up oil consumption in these two countries by at least 5% next year. There will be approximately 40M more cars on the roads in 4 years in these countries.
  2. Current demand for oil is running at 90m barrels per day. China and India consume 9m bpd. A 5% increase is ~500K bpd. Other countries’ consumption will easily drive this to 1m bpd.
  3. Current supply for oil is around 90 million barrels per day. Despite rampant cheating on quotas, major shortfalls by Venezuela, Indonesia and Iran (total miss 1.8m bpd or ~7% of total). The reason for these misses is underinvestment in infrastructure. In any case, oil production is maxed out: oil producing states are selling everything that they can extract. Current projects to increase supplies will add ~18% over the next 10 years.
  4. Current and projected demand will consume current and projected supply.
  5. There are many new sources of supply. New technologies can breathe life into old oil wells. Oil can be extracted faster from known oil fields through the digging of more wells (the US has over a million wells, Saudi Arabia less than 2,000). The return of former major oil producers like Iraq, Libya, and even Caspian Sea countries. Discoveries in other countries like Kazakhstan & Sudan. And offshore drilling. With the exception of offshore drilling, these new supplies are already factored in.
  6. Access to new oil supplies is very restricted. Most countries have nationalized the oil industry, so private oil companies must be more aggressive with exploration and discovery. Corruption in Asia Pacific is a major stumbling block to investing in exploration. After years of feuding, Indonesia and Exxon just signed a deal to move forward to produce oil from the massive Cepu field. With this finally resolved, more exploration in these areas may proceed.
  7. There are other supplies in the form of alternative fuels and fuel efficiencies. However, alternative fuels primarily substitute for coal, not oil, when it comes to supplying electricity to the home. In the case of mobility, there is no substitute. Biomass like Ethanol is not really viable without massive subsidies to US farmers. Hybrid cars merely present more fuel efficient ways of storing energy on the car, and hybrid represent a small percentage of new cars sold. The result is that any contribution to fuel efficiency and reduction in oil demand will be outweighed by growth in cars around the world.

Which is a long way to say: there is enormous pressure to produce and discover more oil fields.

Short term oil price fluctuations are possible in a tight supply/demand scenario. A small movement either way has much bigger implications in the short term. For example, the usual slowdown of oil consumption in the US during the Fall is temporary but it is causing a slight - very -slight - build up in surpluses. The result - oil drops almost 10% in price.

Other real or perceived impacts on supply/demand have also played a role. Nigerian disruption, Iran sanction concerns, the Israel/Hizballah crisis, as well as the Prudhoe Bay worries, Katrina aftermath and fears of a return of Hurricane wreckage in the gulf. So we are returning to a more normal path. Notice that I discount the fears of an American slowdown affecting prices. A slowdown will reduce oil consumption but not as drastically as many fear. The plastics and petrochemical industries slow, and some industrial production, but people will still heat their homes as much and drive their cars.

The fact remains that these perceptions and real fluctuations in supply and demand can dramatically move prices at the pump. As you can see in the chart below.


From an investment viewpoint, however, month-to-month oil price fluctuations do not affect investments by big oil companies and smaller countries. Vietnam doesn’t care what it takes – they need oil revenue and supplies. They don’t care about OPEC quotas. The same goes for Russia – their economy is alive only thanks to oil. They will pump as much oil as possible. Oil is what keeps authoritarian governments in power.

What about OPEC claims to reduce oil production if the oil price falls too low? That is symbolic – an important gesture, certainly – but only symbolic. OPEC countries don’t want to reduce production. And they will cheat on quotas as much if not more. Notice also that OPEC control over world markets has dropped to almost 50% and that this drop is continuing. Their ability to influence world oil markets is strong but weakening.

So who benefits? Oil companies and refineries will make money, but their profits and stock prices will vary according to the oil prices. When it comes to extracting oil – pipe builders, drillers, oil rigs and shippers are in the catbird seats.

Quick comment: Why markets often get it wrong

Is it possible for the market to be wrong? Does taking a contrarian position make sense?
The answer to both can be “yes.” Take Ethan Allen (ETH). Back in August I said that furniture sales would decline as housing slowed down and people no longer needed to buy furniture for their homes. Sure enough, ETH announced that they will be 10%+ below revenue forecasts (and probably more in earnings because they pumped up sales with special offers). The same is true for Whirlpool (WHR) which Citibank declared a sell.

How is it that I can foresee this but the market analysts do not? The answer is that most analysts do not think or perform due diligence – they take whatever information gets offered them by the company. This is the origin of the herd mentality. This is where you make money – by doing what lazy analysts don’t do.

This is also what has been happening in the broader market since May. Some analysts and money managers dusted off textbooks that told them that at this stage of the business cycle one should divest stock and especially commodities. Nevermind the actual performance of these stocks. Nevermind that the economy is still quite strong. The invest-by-the-numbers plan said to get out.

There is also risk associated with being contrarian or thinking that you are right when the market is wrong. But there are different kinds of risk. There is the risk of degree: a company will do better or worse than expected by the market. Then there is the risk of direction: a company will go up when folks think it will go down, or vice versa. My take on housing has been a combination of both degree and direction where I believed the worst and so far have been proven right. More risk is associated with direction than degree. And so is more reward.

I rarely like to be contrarian. I prefer to take risks of degree (for example, the risk that Trident is performing a lot better than experts think). Risks of direction take longer to payoff and can be much more painful if wrong.

Catching Up

Ok, thanks for your patience.
I had to move and do a lot of things.


I will be posting the following today and over the next few days:
1. Revisiting our investment areas: oil, shorting housing and related stocks, high tech
2. My option strategy: why haven't I gotten out of some positions when the timing lookde good, why am I still in positions that look bad
3. Stock updates
4. Specific stock observations