Friday, September 12, 2008

Writing ETFC Covered calls

Writing the ETFC $4 Oct calls
10 contracts $0.15 per share

Here's the math:
Sold Oct $3 $0.50
Bought back Oct $3 $0.35
Selling Oct $4 for $0.15
----------------------------
$300 cash for the calls
Moved strike price from $3 to $4

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Buying back ETFC Oct $3 calls

10 contracts
$0.35 each

Sunday, September 07, 2008

Week Preview: Big Moves Up

The markets will love the FRE/FNM takeover. This will be taken a s a sign of the bottom, and in a way it is for the investment banks. I expect ETFC to move up sharply. The systemic financial market risk has been removed.

As a Citigroup analyst put it:
"This stops well short of the 'nightmare scenario' where foreign investors start to sell the stock of their U.S. holdings, triggering a U.S. dollar collapse, but represents another factor arguing against more dollar-favorable capital flows."

In other words, a short term panic is averted. But the bad news has not been addressed. I expect the positive momentum to carry forward as banks report earnings. Then I expect retail to bring the markets back down. To reality.

Which means bad news for the puts and ultrashorts and possibly good news for the calls. After all, the real reason for the rapid run-down in commodities is hedge fund panic. Also, Hurricane Ike is sweeping up the Gulf and this time it might be a serious impact on Gulf oil and gas production.

US owns Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Inflationary or not?

The government unveiled their plan to takeover FNM/FRE.

A quick re-cap of why this matters.
The mortgage industry today is structured very differently today. Mortgages are bought and sold to government entities, pension funds and other investment groups that want a steady cash flow. The banks processing the individual loans rely on a clearinghouse to aggregate the loans and sell them on. This role has been played by Fannie Mae.

Fannie Mae's role is more than just an expediter. It provides a certain amount of liquidity and risk management, both of which keep mortgage prices low. Without a Fannie Mae, mortgage rates would soar. FNM's business model is simple - they make money on the difference between the rates on the money they borrow and the rates on the loans they buy. That might only be 1/4%, but it's across trillions of dollars.

Lately FNM/FRE have faced a serious problem. Entities don't want to buy their debt because they rightly doubt the companies' longterm viability. Inability to borrow cash is a double hit: FNM/FRE can't buy mortgage loans and FNM/FRE capitalization (aka solvency) is a problem.

To calm the markets, some tricks have been rolled out. last month they sold $2B in new debt. http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=OBR&Date=20080825&ID=9058077&Symbol=FNM
In reality, they just rolled over new debt for old debt. Buyers of new debt were guaranteed that FNM/FRE would use the cash to buy back the same amount of old debt. In other words, buyers did not want to increase exposure to FNM/FRE but they were willing to go along with the game to bolster FNM/FRE shows of strength. Not only that, but FNM/FRE capitalization didn't change. Why the charade? To prevent a massive dumping of FNM/FRE debt. That would make their capitalization that much worse and make the value much less for the bond holders.

China had $340B in FNM/FRE debt, and they are selling it and not buying any more.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/business/worldbusiness/05yuan.html?bl&ex=1220760000&en=911c9604f792c501&ei=5087%0A

The implications of a FNM/FRE failure go beyond the US housing market and hit directly at the entire US economic model. We depend on low-cost debt. The term "too big to fail" is bandied around a lot, but the reality is, if we don't keep FNM/FRE in business, then global investors will lose faith in our system. If we had to compete for money in the global marketplace, we would have to raise interest rates a lot higher.

Even saving FNM/FRE opens the door to inflation. A lot of money has to get printed to cover the debt. The US Government just added $5T in debt.

Now, not all of that debt is bad. But would you, as an investor, feel comfortable trusting anyone to tell you which is which? Especially given the current climate of accelerating foreclosures and falling prices.

In fact, price stability is critical. Can it be delivered? It will be very hard in a recessionary climate with unemployment rising. Incredibly, making housing out of reach for the majority of Americans is th eonly way to keep the US economy afloat.

It's hard to know how the markets will react. They will favor the 'business as usual' approach that will maintain the current system of writing mortgages and selling them on.
ETFC and other investment companies should look good because they can now unload their FNM/FRE debt onto taxpayers.

The dollar could even rise as US economic stability is delivered, regardless of the cost. After all, wth global recession on the way and inflation largely tamed, other countries have scope to drop interest rates. By default, that makes the dollar stronger. That would mean a further drop in commodity prices. Oil at $80???

Or will the markets realize that this can not be funded without printing more dollars, undermining its value? It's a fight between reality (the dollar is more worthless) and systemic collusion (governments fighting to keep the dollar strong)

Q2 GDP: Domestic recession and Export Strength

I look at unemployment data for two very important reasons. First, because it gives a general sense of where the economy is heading. Unemployment is both a lagging indicator (business is good/bad and so they are hiring/firing) and it’s a leading indicator (the US economy is driven by consumer spending, which in turn is driven by income). Unemployment at 6.1% is at recessionary levels.

But a far more specific reason to watch unemployment is that it can reveal which sectors are doing well. If boom times mean heavy hiring, then heavy hiring confirms boom times.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t14.htm
From March to July, preliminary figures say that payroll has dropped 215K jobs (seasonally adjusted), and at a constant rate of ~50K jobs per month. Because the actual numbers are massaged and rarely believable, I will concentrate on the trends.

Most of the drop is from construction and manufacturing, just as most of the rise is in extracting and shipping coal, gas, oil and other mined products.

Over 50% of all sectors are firing people. Ignore Healthcare and the government, and there is almost no hiring. But the strongest growth in employment in relative terms is oil & mining. Nearly 5% growth in payrolls in just 5 months. Business must be good for those sectors.

For the rest of the economy, however, things are clearly trending down. Compared to the last recession, unemployment rates are almost as high. Also interesting is how similar the unemployment picture looks compared with the 2001/2002 recession
Sharp spikes in unemployment on a month-to-month basis
All monthly changes are increases in unemployment

The GDP numbers are also revealing. The first challenge is that the reported figures are based on seasonally adjusted and inflation adjusted figures. The problem is that this methodology says that spending on electricity and gas has been flat for 5 months.
Instead, lets use the raw data – not adjusted for inflation or seasonality.

The 2008 Q2 GDP was $1.43T, a $600B increase over 2007 Q2 GDP of $1.38T.
* Personal Consumption $500B: $100B more for food (7% annual increase) & $120B for gas/electricity (23% increase). Also $100B for medical care.
* Private Investment -$150B: Continued commercial construction grew $75B but was more than offset by a $150B drop in home buying and a $75B drop in business inventories.
* Exports/Imports: Exports rose $300B and imports surged $313B.
* Government spent an extra $200B.

Think about this for a moment. GDP spending increased because people had to pay more for food, gas and healthcare. They stopped buying homes and businesses stopped adding inventory. The only big spending entity was the government. That is not productive growth and it is not a good picture of the future economy.

If anything, this is proof that we are in a major domestic recession and only exporters are doing well:
- Companies are hurting
- Corporate Profits are down 7% since last year
- Investment is down (15% of GDP) and businesses are unloading goods and not restocking
- Consumer spending (71% of GDP) is going to essentials (food, gas, medical) and squeezing out everything else
- Durable goods (7% of total GDP) is down 2%
- Non-durable spending is up (22% of total GDP) but that’s mainly on food & gas
- Service spending (42% of GDP) is up and that’s medical care
- Exports rose – but that’s mostly commodities, which is not broad based
- Imports also rose, but that does not reflect a strong consumer appetite but the higher prices paid for gas. Peel out the gas component, and spending on non-oil related products is sharply down.

Business is belt tightening in response to lower consumer spending – administrative and support staff are being laid off, inventory is being dumped and not replenished, what’s next?